On Thu, 27 Nov 2025 01:41:46 GMT, Anthony Scarpino <[email protected]> wrote:
> I understand the intent to use `PEM` here, but I think this is forcing the > new API onto these tests rather than making it easier. For > `TestKeyFactory.java` I wouldn't make the change. For the other two, I think > it makes more sense to headers and footers to the base64 strings than using > `PEM` to workaround it. Yes, I think this should be easier. However, I'd have to disagree about `PKIXValAndRevCheckTests.java`. I use it intentionally there like this in order to increase the coverage of the PEM::decode method. What do you think about keeping it as is and changing `PSSKeyCompatibility` in order not to force PEM? ------------- PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/28356#issuecomment-3718493332
