On Wed, 15 Apr 2026 09:11:12 GMT, Mikhail Yankelevich 
<[email protected]> wrote:

>> Brent Christian has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a 
>> merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes 
>> brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains seven additional 
>> commits since the last revision:
>> 
>>  - Merge branch 'master' into smartcardio
>>  - update example code in javax.smartcardio package doc to use try-finally
>>  - minor comment update
>>  - add missed clean() calls, update comments
>>  - fix imports and copyright years
>>  - add test case
>>  - convert CardImpl finalizer to use Cleaner
>
> test/jdk/sun/security/smartcardio/TestCleaner.java line 54:
> 
>> 52:  * CardImpl from becoming unreachable and being collected/cleaned.
>> 53:  */
>> 54: public class TestCleaner extends Utils {
> 
> Since this is a manual test have you considered using a ui for instructions? 
> I think the go-to method now is `UIBuilder`. e.g. : 
> 
>     final JDialog dialog = new UIBuilder.DialogBuilder()
>                 .setTitle("Title")
>                 .setInstruction(instruction)
>                 .setMessage(message)
>                 .setPassAction(e -> pass())
>                 .setFailAction(e -> fail())
>                 .setCloseAction(this::abort)
>                 .build();
> 
> https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/blob/master/test/jdk/com/sun/security/auth/callback/TextCallbackHandler/Password.java#L85

Hi, Mikhail

I've made `TestCleaner.java` similar to the other `@run main/manual` tests in 
`test/jdk/sun/security/smartcardio/`, which don't create a GUI explicitly. I 
admit that I don't know the specifics of how these tests are run, but AFAIK one 
can still bring up the gui using `jtreg -gui ...`.

As with the other tests, `TestCleaner` "requires special hardware" (a real or 
simulated JavaCard).
As long as a `CardTerminal.connect()` can be performed, `TestCleaner` runs on 
its own, and doesn't require manual intervention (or, IMO, instructions).

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/30683#discussion_r3211825113

Reply via email to