Hi Heetae, In JBS, a bug can only be assigned to an OpenJDK author [1].
That said, you can definitely start working on it and propose a PR on GitHub. Your name will be recorded in a Contributed-by attribute. At the moment I can assign it to myself so no one else will picks it up while you are working on it. I'll be happy to sponsor your code change once it's approved. Good luck to your first contribution! Thanks, Weijun [1] https://openjdk.org/guide/#becoming-an-author > On Sep 27, 2026, at 08:35, HEETAE PARK <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi, > > Apologies, the formatting of my previous mail was lost. Re-sending it > in plain text. > > I'd like to work on JDK-8392624 [1]. The example in the class description > of java.security.DrbgParameters.Capability does not compile. > > Current: > > SecureRandom s = SecureRandom.getInstance("DRBG", > DrbgParameters(-1, requested, null)); > Capability effective = ((DrbgParametes.Initiate) s.getParameters()) > .getCapability(); > > Proposed: > > SecureRandom s = SecureRandom.getInstance("DRBG", > DrbgParameters.instantiation(-1, requested, null)); > Capability effective = ((DrbgParameters.Instantiation) s.getParameters()) > .getCapability(); > > The DrbgParameters constructor is private, so the static factory > instantiation(...) should be used, and the nested class is Instantiation, > not Initiate. I verified that the corrected snippet compiles and runs. > The change is javadoc-only (noreg-doc). > > I have signed the OCA (GitHub: HuitaePark). As this would be my first > contribution, I would appreciate a sponsor, and would be grateful if > someone could assign the issue to me. > > [1] https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8392624 > > Thanks, > Heetae Park
