On Mon, 12 Oct 2026 03:34:28 GMT, Shawn Emery <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Cool - very impressive performance improvements! > >> Cool - very impressive performance improvements! > > Thank you. I've since made an additional change that eliminates a temporary > object which results in an additional ~13% improvement for both > architectures tested. > > @vpaprotsk could you please review these changes as your optimization work > with the P-256 curve in Java makes you a prime (no pun intended) candidate > for review of these changes. @smemery Looks good so far... I wrote myself a fuzz test (modified my montgomery p256 one really) and everything is passing after some very long runs. Want to stare at the code a bit more though, this one was tricky bit of machinery and the negative biasing always tripped me up. (PS: I wonder.. what would it take to get the whole generator up to 64 bits? You might already be halfway there?) ------------- PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/33193#issuecomment-6180656056
