Berin, Just trying to think through 5D002 - would it not be the case that part of the signature code is more under EAR, or perhaps is the generic EAR99, or just under 5D002.a ?
Though I guess we need to apply an ECCN to the -whole- distribution; so that would atomatically be a 5D002, in the introduction to CFR it is not clear if you need to state the 'worst' or 'all' Dw On Sun, 4 Jan 2004, Berin Lautenbach wrote: > SUBMISSION TYPE: TSU > SUBMITTED BY: Berin Lautenbach > SUBMITTED FOR: Apache Software Foundation > POINT OF CONTACT: Apache's XML Security Project > PHONE and/or FAX: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > MANUFACTURER: N/A > PRODUCT NAME/MODEL #: XML-Security-C Library > ECCN: 5D002 > > NOTIFICATION: > Web site - http://xml.apache.org/security/c > CVS Repository - http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/xml-security/c/src/ > Download directory - http://www.apache.org/dist/xml/security/c-library/ > > NOTE : Current downloadable release code does not contain the new > XML-Encryption code, only digital signature code. See CVS repository > for new code. >
