DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33414>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33414 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-02-08 22:21 ------- Thanks...is there any value though in making this part of the code optional or disabling it via a property for people using the library in a manner that doesn't require XPath? I'm under the impression that using enveloped signatures in a simple manner doesn't require it. That means at least some of us could disable the xalan dependency and basically run without it entirely. It used to be that xmlsec Init used all those XPath calls, but now this looks like more of a proper dependency for actual code in the signature system, and if that's not being used... If I'm mistaken, sorry for wasting your time, just want to be sure there's not a way around this. The support mess waiting for me here is not small. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
