Explicetly use exclusive c14n instead of the default inclusive one.
On Fri, 18 Feb 2005 09:50:00 -0800, Prakasa Nedunuri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Vishal, > Is there anyway I can bypass this problem? > Thanks, > Prakasa > > > At 02:40 PM 2/18/2005 +0530, Vishal Mahajan wrote: > > Hi Prakasa, > > This happens because the encryption code internally uses a > canonicalization-based serializer. During canonicalization the namespace > attributes are cascaded down the root node. > > Vishal > > Prakasa Nedunuri wrote: > > Hi, > I am trying to encrypt and decrypt SOAP body using xmlsec library. > Before encrypting, my original SOAP message is > > <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> > <soapenv:Envelope xmlns:soapenv="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/"; > xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"; > xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance";> > <soapenv:Body> > <StockQuoteRequest > xmlns="http://stockservice.contoso.com/wse/samples/2003/06";> > <symbols> > <Symbol>FABRIKAM</Symbol> > <Symbol>CONSTOSO</Symbol> > </symbols> > <symbols1> > <Symbol>CSCO</Symbol> > <Symbol>JNPR</Symbol> > </symbols1> > <symbols2> > <Symbol>ttt</Symbol> > <Symbol>ppp</Symbol> > </symbols2> > </StockQuoteRequest> > </soapenv:Body> > </soapenv:Envelope> > > However, after I decrypt the message, I see that StockQuoteRequest element > has additional namespaces which are > not present in the original message before encrypting. > <StockQuoteRequest > xmlns="http://stockservice.contoso.com/wse/samples/2003/06"; > xmlns:soapenv="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/"; > xmlns:xenc="http://www.w3.org/2001/04/xmlenc#"; > xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"; > xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance";> > <symbols> > <Symbol>FABRIKAM</Symbol> > <Symbol>CONSTOSO</Symbol> > </symbols> > <symbols1> > <Symbol>CSCO</Symbol> > <Symbol>JNPR</Symbol> > </symbols1> > <symbols2> > <Symbol>ttt</Symbol> > <Symbol>ppp</Symbol> > </symbols2> > </StockQuoteRequest> > > Any reason why the additional namespaces are getting added to > StockQuoteRequest element? > Anyway I can retain the original message without having these namespaces > getting added. > > Thanks, > Prakasa > -- http://r-bg.com
