Vishal,

what's the problem u are having with WSE?

thanks,
dims

On 4/13/05, Vishal Mahajan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> After more investigation I feel that the Java library is fine. Even
> though I'm still having some WS-Security issues, they mainly seem to be
> on the WSE2 side, which I'll try raising on some .NET forum.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Vishal
> 
> Vishal Mahajan wrote:
> 
> > Yes it shows in my email also, but the actual document doesn't have
> > this. Anyways, I've also attached the tared document this time.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Vishal
> >
> > Raul Benito wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Vishal,
> >>   The digest method look very weird to me:
> >> <DigestMethod Algorithm="http://www.w3.org/!
> >>  2000/09/xmldsig#sha1" />
> >>
> >> Perhaps it something in my email, but you can take a look there.
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >>
> >>
> >> On Apr 11, 2005 9:12 PM, *Vishal Mahajan* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
> >>
> >>     I've attached the soap document signed by .NET
> >>     (interop_dotnet_sig.xml) and the certificate (apcert1.cer) to be
> >>     used for verification. The reference validation fails for the soap
> >>     body. Note that the 'ID Type' attribute used on the soap body is a
> >>     wsu:Id and hence WssIdResolver (attached) needs to be registered
> >>     with the library.
> >>
> >>     Vishal
> >>
> >>
> >>     Raul Benito wrote:
> >>
> >>>     Hi Vishal,
> >>>     can you post the document?
> >>>
> >>>     On Apr 11, 2005 11:22 AM, *Vishal Mahajan*
> >>>     <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>         I know this topic has been raised earlier on the list. I
> >>>         would like to
> >>>         know if someone has got Apache xml-security-J interoperating
> >>>         with the
> >>>         .NET (Microsoft WSE)? I've been trying to debug this for
> >>>         quite some
> >>>         while now without much success. The reference validation
> >>>         seems to be
> >>>         failing. The strange thing is that the document that .NET
> >>>         signed didn't
> >>>         even contain any white-space, even then our library seems to
> >>>         be failing
> >>>         in validating the signature, and vice versa.
> >>>
> >>>         Vishal
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>     --     http://r-bg.com
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> http://r-bg.com
> >
> >
> >
> 
> 


-- 
Davanum Srinivas - http://webservices.apache.org/~dims/

Reply via email to