I've just change the internal structure where the xmlns bindings are
stored(i.e. the the things that binds the prefix with the URI and
whether they are already rendered or not) to my own hash table
implementation.
The main improve will be space and GC pressure. But perhaps I'm
drooping some performance,I can not find a big impact neither in the
tests (about a 3% better) nor in my own real world (5% better).
But perhaps other uses see regressions. Can people check the CVS head and see how it goes?
If no complains I will let it rest forever in CVS.
Regards,
Raul
--
http://r-bg.com
