Hi Stefeno,
I think you have hit a bug in the changes I do for xpath between 1.2
and 1.3, do you mind to open a bug report in bugzilla?
Please, attach a test case that shos the bug(This increase the speed
of fix a lot...).
Regards,
On 1/27/06, Berin Lautenbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Stefano Del Sal wrote:
> > I'm trying to sign a document using the transform TRANSFORM_XPATH2FILTER,
> > but I get a bad signature if I try to use ONLY the filter
> > XPath2FilterContainer.SUBTRACT
> >
> > 1) Ex:
> > String filters[][] = {
> > {XPath2FilterContainer.SUBTRACT, "//NotToBeSigned"}
> > };
> > transforms.addTransform(
> > Transforms.TRANSFORM_XPATH2FILTER,
> > XPath2FilterContainer.newInstances(doc, filters)
> > );
>
> I'm assuming that the input nodeset is everything in the document?
> (E.g. URI=""). If that's the case then this is a bug. Adding a union
> (as in your second example) should not change the input node set for the
> subtraction filter.
>
> Unfortunately I'm not close enough to this code to fix it quickly.
>
> Raul - do you know if anything changed in this area with the
> optimisation work?
>
> Cheers,
> Berin
>
--
http://r-bg.com
