DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40076>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40076 Summary: Denigrated (org.apache.xml.security.keys.content.x509.XMLX509Issuer Serial) Product: Security Version: Java 1.3 Platform: All OS/Version: other Status: NEW Keywords: RFC Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: Encryption AssignedTo: security-dev@xml.apache.org ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] org.apache.xml.security.keys.content.x509.XMLX509IssuerSerial ... public XMLX509IssuerSerial(Document doc, X509Certificate x509certificate) { this(doc, RFC2253Parser.normalize(x509certificate.getIssuerDN().getName()), x509certificate.getSerialNumber()); } In this piece of code, x509certificate.getIssuerDN().getName() should be replaced by x509certificate.getIssuerX500Principal().getName(), as suggested by the JDK 1.5 API (http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/docs/api/java/security/cert/X509Certificate.html #getIssuerDN()) The problem I have now, is that the IssuerDN with the current implementation will report: [EMAIL PROTECTED],CN=blah,... RFC2253 format will report: 1.2.840.113549.1.9.1=#<hex string>,CN=blah,... This cause issuer distinguished name not to be identified. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
