I'm finding the same thing, apache's xmlsec is going very smoothly (ignoring 1 or 3 brain farts).
Nope, XML templates. It seems to be the easiest way to use his library. http://www.aleksey.com/xmlsec/api/xmlsec-examples-sign-template-file.html JLC On Thu, Aug 31, 2006 at 03:42:30PM -0400, SCOTT CANTOR wrote: > > I'd like to ask the apache-xmlsec folk what their thoughts are on > > aleksey'sxmlsec application/library. > > I'm just "me" folk, but I've used both. xmlsec was in C with libxml vs. C++ > with Xerces, so for me Apache's was necessary. I found xmlsec a little harder > to use, and it made it harder to see how to completely override the trust > processing, but that's just a personal view. > > > Do you do inter-operability testing with it? Why does he use templates so > > much and I've had a hard time finding any mention of templates in > > apache-xmlsec? > > Templates? I take it you mean something other than C++ templates, since > that's C code. > > -- Scott >
