DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUGĀ·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40512>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED ANDĀ·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40512





------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-09-14 15:22 -------
Sorry for the delay too much daily work.
For me the better is the 4. Document it and let the people work.

The point 3 can be done but the solution is slightly different and can be slow.
The change comes because of the thread issues and the "slowness" of
newInstance() method. Before the change we create a transform object for every
signature to process. After the change we create only a stateless object and
reuse in all transformations. 

Your solution can change slightly with(I have no compiler here so take it with a
grain of salt).

try {
  result = transformSpi.enginePerformTransform(input,this);
} catch (UnsupportedOperationException ex) {
  TransformSpi newTransformSpi=transformSpi.class.newInstance();
  newTransformSpi.setTransfor(this);
  result = newTransformSpi.enginePerformTransform(input);
}

What do you think?

The only main problem with your solution is that when someone want to create a
Transform the compiler will not force to implement any method.

If there is enough push for the 3. I will implement this. But I still think it
should be better to document the change.

Regards,
Raul

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

Reply via email to