DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40826>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40826 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-11-02 05:36 ------- (In reply to comment #9) > Ok, I looked into this a little bit more and still need more details. > > First, if you remove the SunPKCS11 provider and create a new instance, then > any > PrivateKey objects from the old SunPKCS11 instance will not be usable with the > new instance (and this exception will be thrown). > If the privateKey object is from the new provider, it should work. > > Can you let me know if you are doing this? Each time i sign, i add the provider (Security.addProvider(p)) and create a new PrivateKey object. Im not reusing nothing.. is it correct ? or i must have to remove and add the provider each time? from what i know...when we use the addProvider, it add the provider in the available slot, but we can add in a specific slot, just using addProviderAt(p, 2) for instance. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
