I haven't but it looks intersting. Not too many changes: 1.-Changes in xml: handling, increase the complexity to decide if the attribute is single inheritance or otherwise. 2.-Changes in xmlns: sorting now is sort on prefix name instead of uri. But the other attributes are still sorted with the namespace URI. Do you see more changes?
Anyway I'm having problems regisitring to w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org, and I want. Does anybody know how to do it? Regards, On 12/23/06, Berin Lautenbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Anyone looked at this? -------- Original Message -------- Subject: RE: Last Call for C14N 1.1 (and updated WG notes) Resent-Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 19:34:15 +0000 Resent-From: w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 14:33:49 -0500 From: Grosso, Paul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Some information about changes to the latest versions: Canonical XML 1.1 ----------------- The *First* Public Working Draft of C14N 1.1 available at http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-xml-c14n11-20060915/ was marked up to show the changes between C14N 1.0 and that first public WD of C14N 1.1. I have just made available a version showing the changes between the First Public Working Draft of C14N 1.1 and this Last Call Working Draft of C14N 1.1 at http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2006/12/WD-xml-c14n11-20061220-review.html (member only) which I soon hope to have also available at http://www.w3.org/XML/2006/12/WD-xml-c14n11-20061220-review.html (publicly accessible) as soon as someone with permissions can do that. Known Issues with Canonical XML 1.0 (C14N/1.0) ---------------------------------------------- There were no substantive changes between the first WD at http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-C14N-issues-20060915/ and this latest version other than formatting it as a WG Note. Using XML Digital Signatures in the 2006 XML Environment -------------------------------------------------------- There were no substantive changes between the first WD at http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-DSig-usage-20060915/ and this latest version. The editorial changes were: - clarifying that it's just a note - changing the URI proposed for C14N-1.1 to www.w3.org/2006/12/xml-c14n11 paul > -----Original Message----- > From: Grosso, Paul > Sent: Wednesday, 2006 December 20 11:23 > To: 'w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org'; > '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > Subject: Last Call for C14N 1.1 (and updated WG notes) > > > The XML Core WG announces the publication of and requests > review of the Last Call WD of: > > Canonical XML 1.1 > ----------------- > This version: > http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-xml-c14n11-20061220 > Latest version: > http://www.w3.org/TR/xml-c14n11 > > > Also published at this time are the following related > Working Group Notes: > > Known Issues with Canonical XML 1.0 (C14N/1.0) > ---------------------------------------------- > This version: > http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/NOTE-C14N-issues-20061220/ > Latest version: > http://www.w3.org/TR/C14N-issues/ > > > Using XML Digital Signatures in the 2006 XML Environment > -------------------------------------------------------- > This version: > http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/NOTE-DSig-usage-20061220/ > Latest version: > http://www.w3.org/TR/DSig-usage/ >
-- http://r-bg.com
