Hello, I am using xml-security 1.4.0 (java) for my project. And I have found several bugs of this library (Perhaps bugs of the used third-party libraries):
1. In org.apache.xml.security.c14n.implementations.CanonicalizerBase and org.apache.xml.security.c14n.implementations.UtfHelpper (How about if the class name if changed to UtfHelper with ONE p?): The line if ((c & 0x80) ==0) should be changed to if(c < 0x80), since the most UTF-chars have 0 at bit 8. 2. There are always two text nodes with the value '\n' in succession within <ds:SignedInfo> and <ds:X509IssuerSerial>. If we have signed some elements and wish to add another signature with xpath as the tranform, then we get the error that says no node can be found to a handle raised by xalan-J). After the debug I found the responding codes as in following: 01 public SignedInfo( 02 Document doc, Element SignatureMethodElem, Element CanonicalizationMethodElem) 03 throws XMLSecurityException { 04 05 super(doc); 06 this._constructionElement.appendChild(CanonicalizationMethodElem); 07 XMLUtils.addReturnToElement(this._constructionElement); 08 //Check this? 09 this.c14nMethod=CanonicalizationMethodElem; 10 this._constructionElement.appendChild(c14nMethod); 11 XMLUtils.addReturnToElement(this._constructionElement); this._signatureAlgorithm = new SignatureAlgorithm(SignatureMethodElem, null); signatureMethod=this._signatureAlgorithm.getElement(); this._constructionElement.appendChild(signatureMethod); XMLUtils.addReturnToElement(this._constructionElement); } Line 06 and 10 add the same element twice, hence the line 06 has no effect. But the text-node with the value "\n" added at line 07 is remained there. 01 public XMLX509IssuerSerial(Document doc, String X509IssuerName, 02 BigInteger X509SerialNumber) { 03 super(doc); 04 05 XMLUtils.addReturnToElement(this._constructionElement); 06 this.addTextElement(X509IssuerName, Constants._TAG_X509ISSUERNAME); 07 XMLUtils.addReturnToElement(this._constructionElement); 08 this.addTextElement(X509SerialNumber.toString(), Constants._TAG_X509SERIALNUMBER); 09 } Line 07 should be removed, since '\n' is added in line 06. Best regards, Lijun Liao