Raul Benito wrote:
> I haven't recived any bad thing about 1.4.1 releas (ok, I have only receive
> only one ok but that is enought)
> What do you think of changing the name of 1.4.1Beta1 into 1.4.1 release?
> [ ] +1 We have all the test we need
> [ ] 0 Perhaps we should wait for more people say ok
> [ ] -1
Would it be possible to integrate my ECDSA interoperability patch into
1.4.1?
It works well for my signatures created with austrian citizen cards and
the authors of the specification of the austrian citizen card
environment are also co-authors of RFC4050 and RFC 4051, which target
the ECDSA signature value encoding inside xml-signatures.
Regards,
Wolfgang
