Hi Scott, [... Help...]
Thanks for the tips, I'll try them out asap! > > Sorry for all these questions and demand on your time, but XML Security > > needs more documentation, quite badly, I think. > > These libraries just aren't set up for novices. Mine aren't either. > Documentation takes a lot of effort and not one person who has ever > complained about it ever donates any back, so that kind of says it all. At Well, that's the thing, isn't it - a vicious circle. E.g., I am not new to XML nor cryptography (my topic is network security), but very new to XML Security... and if people don't find their way into the lib, they will hardly be able to contribute. No offense was meant, Scott, I am sure the developers do their best. Tell you what, as soon as I've finished this project of mine here (my Master's thesis), I'll give it a try and compile my samples into something useful and see if I can add a bit of documentation, tutorial or FAQ-like. Though the JavaDoc, obviously, should be done by the developers. Ralph -- For contact details, please see www.ralphholz.de.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
