Berin Lautenbach wrote:
Should do something on this. I haven't even looked at it yet - are the
changes big?
Not too bad, probably a few days work. Use your C14N 1.0 implementation
as a base and then make the changes. The trickiest part is the fixup of
xml:base, but there is a test suite available for testing your changes
which helps:
http://www.w3.org/2007/xmlsec/interop/xmlsig-interop-doc/testcases.html
I have checked these test signatures/c14n data into our repository in
the data/org/w3c/www/interop directory.
Let me know if you have any questions ...
--Sean
Cheers,
Berin
Sean Mullan wrote:
Forwarding to the list ...
Berin, any plans to add support for C14N 1.1?
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subject:
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 42653] Add support for C14N 1.1 to Java implementation
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date:
Tue, 01 Apr 2008 08:16:49 -0700 (PDT)
To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42653
Matej Spiller-Muys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Comment #2 from Matej Spiller-Muys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
2008-04-01 08:16:49 PST ---
Great job guys. Is there any plan for C14N 1.1 C++ support?
