https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45586
--- Comment #15 from Brent Putman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-09-23 13:52:52 PST --- I'm afraid I haven't worked much with enveloping so I don't know about special issues there. I would venture a guess that if the signing and validation are done in the same XML contexts, then the standard inclusive c14n 1.0 is likely ok. However, if you want to take an enveloping Signature element and embed it in some other document, then you've got issues there, I imagine. Note also that there is a newer 1.1 version of the inclusive C14N algorithm. I'm not up on the differences with 1.0, just fyi. http://www.w3.org/TR/xml-c14n11/ I believe it's supposed to be supported by the latest Apache Java xmlsec (1.4.2). -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.
