Le dim. 16 janv. 2022 à 17:13, Sam Ruby <[email protected]> a écrit : > > In discussions with US Senate Staffers, it became apparent that there is > a need for a less technical description of both open source
Presenting the rationale for open source to code that "does not provide [...] competitive advantage" is self-deprecating IMHO. > and the > Log4J vulnerability. Not using "jargon" in that section makes it more difficult to follow for programmers while probably not any clearer for non-programmers. Since "code" and "library" have been defined in the first section, the usual terms could then be used afterwards as appropriate. > I've taken a first stab at this, and placed it here: > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/COMDEV/Log4j+vulnerability+background s/Software Build of Materials/Software Bill of Materials/ ? Best regards, Gilles > As always, this is on a wiki. You know what you need to do! > > - Sam Ruby > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
