On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 04:26:07AM -0500, Alfred M. Szmidt wrote: > What the actual license should be of something is not for you to > decide, that is up to St. IGNUcius and the maintainer of the software. > How about we leave it to them to say what should or shouldn't be?
I just guess, that the mailing lists are there to engage in conversation, so that groups of people find agreements and better ways of promoting GNU software. Neither, I ever said that I am deciding anything. I am rather pointing out to ready made policies and guidelines which are helpful for maintainers and those decision makers. As long as I am allowed to write to the list, I will write. I like free software, and I also like to be more straight to public in regards to free software promotion, teaching, enlightening people. There is nothing wrong in communicating to others to improve, or to align with the free software goals. Yes, I have the agenda, the agenda is to promote free software and freedoms along it. It just happen that I like to look into details, like "Free & Open Source" terminology. Doxygen documents, may be suitable, like you have elaborated. Maybe it just happen to me that I am used to other GNU packages with info files, that may be converted to any format. That is my personal experience and habit that has to be broken. Jean Louis
