> The server I think should be in SFW the PAM module I'm happy either way
> for SFW or ON. The only reason for ON for the PAM module is that I know
> the code needs slight modification (which is still possible for SFW).
I'm expecting the pam_pkcs11 module we're working on to end up in
SFW with a cross consolidation contract to use some __ convenience
functions from libpam. If I ever get the __ stuff updated and
stabilized, I might consider promoting it's stability from
internal (project private really) to something higher; at least
consolidation private, if not volatile.
Gary..
