Alan Coopersmith wrote: > Lin Ma wrote: > >> I do not always use SunRay. Does sun ray user has the "Console User" >> profile? >> > > No, because the system has one console and one Console User, but can have > dozens or hundreds of Sun Ray users - and the Console User can do things > like suspend or power down the entire system that it would be inappropriate > for a Sun Ray user to do. > OK, you are expecting that SunRay users could use CD devices which connected to SunRay client rather than those connected to SunRay server, aren't you?
I think it depends on how the underlayer works. Brasero couldn't differentiate the local and remote CD devices. Brasero gets device paths from gio(glib), and gio gets them from HAL. I'm not good to understand sunray, but I think if to achieve that goal, sunray layer should hide/restrict accessing server CD devices. Did I miss anything which is already existed I should use? >> Why not create a new "SunRay Session Owner" which will make >> more senses to me? >> > > Which Sun Ray session will that be? You wouldn't want one Sun Ray session > user to have privileges to modify devices in other sessions. > Just my idea :-) To access most local devices and maybe some public server devices. > (Of course, fast user switching in virtual terminals also breaks the > "Console User" model of one user having full rights to the console and > it's devices, but that's not yet implemented in Solaris.) > > lin
