> Yes, the PA is not a good idea.

        Right.

> 
> What I would like is:
> 
>       - a role which you can assume by typing your own password, not the 
> role

        Just to refresh everyone's memory Roles are users.  Roles have
        home directories and can own file objects.  The role password
        provides for credentials (kerberos, dh) to be used by the role
        to access files and authorize applications.

>       - but I would like it to keep the same uid as the user
>         (making the role a different uid in the credential)

        So you want Type Enforcement style roles.  It's still unclear
        to me how those work with network credentials.

Gary..

Reply via email to