Mark Phalan wrote: > On Wed, 2007-08-01 at 10:30 -0700, Keith M Wesolowski wrote: > >> On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 07:06:34PM +0200, Mark Phalan wrote: >> >> >>> Does this imply that other project teams (such as Kerberos) who work on >>> ONNV projects should also be added as contributors? >>> >> As Contributors, yes. The Constitution requires this; section 7.7 >> reads: >> >> # The Contributors of a Community Group shall include every person >> # who has been designated by the Core Contributors of that Group >> # to have contributed substantively to that Group's efforts, >> # including (but not limited to) every person who has contributed >> # intellectual property to the OpenSolaris Community as a result >> # of those efforts. >> >> The use of the term 'intellectual property' is unfortunate since it is >> not defined, but I think it's reasonable to read the intent of this >> language to include contributions of source code, documentation, and >> possibly other material. >> >> It is not necessary, nor in my view appropriate, to name all such >> individuals Core Contributors. I would tend to reserve that >> classification for, perhaps, technical leaders of large-scale projects >> and those who have made and contributed revolutionary technical >> advances, as well as those who have provided superlative leadership >> over a long period of time. However, the specific criteria for the >> grant are up to your Community Group; I don't see anything giving the >> OGB the authority to overrule you. >> >> > > Makes sense. > > I'd like to ask the security community to grant me contributor status > based on the code I've contributed to ONNV. >
It bothers me that you have to ask for this. FWIW, I second your request. -Krishna > Regards, > > -Mark > > _______________________________________________ > security-discuss mailing list > security-discuss at opensolaris.org >
