On Mon, 03 Nov 2008 13:09:23 -0500 Jeffrey Hutzelman wrote: > --On Sunday, November 02, 2008 10:50:00 PM -0600 Nicolas Williams > <Nicolas.Williams at sun.com> wrote:
> > I think a varargs approach would be easier to use. > I think most of us agree on this point. varargs functions are only useful when you have all of the arguments in place at compile time a portable post-compile-time interpreter wishing to use the varargs interface would be out of luck -- Glenn Fowler -- AT&T Research, Florham Park NJ --
