>I'm looking for reviewers for '6613349 setuid not allowed message >could be more useful'. I've tested it on a b101 system without any >issues. It's pretty straightforward (and small) -- just modifying the >message to display the filesystem path (instead of the device number) >and making it zone aware (which is why I included security-discuss and >zones-discuss).
Why do you use the mntpnt and why not the vp->v_path? Casper
