Hi Dave,

Thanks for the comments. I'm wrapping up some other stuff and will get 
back to this as soon as I'm done.

-tony


David Powell wrote:
> Tony Nguyen wrote:
>> Dave,
>>
>> See my responses inline and the updated webrev at:
>>
>> http://cr.opensolaris.org/~tonyn/firewall13Jan2009-inc/
>> http://cr.opensolaris.org/~tonyn/firewall13Jan2009/
> 
>   Thank you, thank you, thank you for creating scf_instance_delete_prop.
> 
>   I'm still working through ipf_include.sh.
> 
>   nfs-server:
> 
>     What's up with waiting for mountd for a second?  Is that even
>     effective?
> 
>   milestone/global.xml:
> 
>     exceptions description:
> 
>       Use the same grammar used in the "apply_to" description.  i.e.
> 
>     The host and network IPs, network interfaces, and ippools to
>     exempt from the set policy.  That is, those to accept if the
>     policy is set to deny, or to deny if the policy is set to
>     accept.
> 
>   svcadm.c:
> 
>     In some places you uu_die if my_ctname fails, in others you uu_warn.
>     The error handling should be consistent.
> 
>     Though it is unlikely that your error messages will ever be seen by
>     the user, if they're worth localizing they're also worth making more
>     meaningful to a non-developer.  e.g. instead of
> 
>       "Failed to process %s: restarter_setup() failed"
> 
>     from which, nonintuitively from the reader's perspective, you
>     continue, something like this would be better:
> 
>       "Unable to record FMRI with request.  svcs -l output may be 
> incomplete."
> 
>   yp.sh:
> 
>     Should there be an exit after the call to create_client_ipf_rules?
> 
>     create_client_ipf_rules appears to mishandle multiple IP address for
>     a single host name.
> 
>     If the host name is a substring of another, you'll get erroneous
>     results.
> 
>     If IPv6 addresses are included in your hosts file, I think your
>     implementation will malfunction.
> 
>   rfc1179.xml:
>   ipp-listener.xml:
> 
>     ipf_method should refer to a full FMRI, not just "print/server".
> 
>   ipfilter.xml:
> 
>     Now that you are starting a persistent daemon, this shouldn't be a
>     transient service.  (Arguably this is an existing bug given ipmon).
> 
>   svc/ipfilter:
> 
>     When you start, there shouldn't be a svc.ipfd to kill.
>     Instead of pgrepping, use smf_kill_contract in the stop method.
> 
>     What does the 'reload' subcommand do, and where is it used and
>     documented?
> 
>     It may seem hacky, but I think I'd prefer having the default policy
>     be empty, and using that default state as an indicator that our
>     initial boot hasn't yet occurred.  An explicit "upgraded" property
>     that gets set once and sticks around forever is unappealing.
>     Additionally, it's one more thing that a profile creator will need to
>     know to set to avoid their settings being overwritten on first boot
>     (e.g. in a jumpstart-like environment).
> 
>   ipfd.c:
> 
>     repository_event_wait:
> 
>       Is the variable 'scratch' still needed?
> 
>     is_correct_event:
> 
>       The seven nearly identical blocks after determining you're dealing
>       with SCF_PG_RESTARTER_ACTIONS could be reduced to a loop through an
>       array of property types to test (you would need two arrays: one for
>       when you're not in_maintenance, and one for all the time).
> 
>   Dave
> 


Reply via email to