Casper.Dik at Sun.COM wrote: > >> It's great that you ARC'd early, but I don't think that somehow >> negates the review requirement for things that might be discovered >> later. > > > It's for a reason that the rules say "ARC early, ARC often". > > Now Darren, why didn't you do the second bit :-)
Waiting until AFTER the codereview comments were in incase someone came up with a nice cunning way to solve the CRYPT_MAXCIPHERTEXTLEN mess I previously created for myself (and in case there are any other comments that would require an update to the approved architecture). -- Darren J Moffat
