On Jun 22, 2016, at 06:29 PM, Ethan Furman wrote: >We have discussed the reasoning behind those two camps ad nauseam on Python >Dev, with fairly disastrous results. I did not create this list so we could >do it again. > >At this point we have two PEPs going. Let's make sure that whichever PEP we >take back to Py-Dev includes all the arguments and objections noted, and then >let Guido or his delegate make the final call.
Yes, agreed. Since this is a new list with a new proposed PEP, I want to be sure that my view is accurately represented. I won't continue to push it and don't plan on responding unless my position isn't accurately represented. Once Guido or his delegate makes the call, it's over. Cheers, -Barry _______________________________________________ Security-SIG mailing list Security-SIG@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/security-sig
