> On 12 Jan 2017, at 10:14, Christian Heimes <christ...@cheimes.de> wrote: > > On 2017-01-12 09:45, Cory Benfield wrote: >> >>> On 11 Jan 2017, at 21:23, Christian Heimes <christ...@cheimes.de> wrote: >>> >>> * Do we need to define blocking / non blocking state of the socket? >> >> I think we want to support both. I’m not sure we need to expose it in the >> API: the implementation can check by asking the socket directly if it cares. > > Do we need to support both? I thought that wrap_buffers() is the > preferred way for non-blocking TLS with an event loop. You are the > expert, do SChannel and SecureTransport work with non-blocking sockets > and WantRead/WantWrite?
Preferred is a general truth, but not always specifically true. In particular, there is value in non-blocking sockets outwith an event loop. Calling me “the expert” on this topic is a little strong, but I know that SecureTransport does. Cory _______________________________________________ Security-SIG mailing list Security-SIG@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/security-sig
