On Thu, Apr 12, 2007 at 09:46:39AM -0600, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: > I would love for us to get ESessions implemented and deployed (or XTLS > or some kind of more sophisticated technology than OpenPGP or S/MIME), > and I will continue to work on that. But I think it's valuable for us to > question our assumptions along the way.
Having just been accepted for GSOC to write an ESessions implementation and test suite, I hope you don't question them *too* hard. ;) > Now, I'll have a chat with Ian about a simplified profile of ESessions > so we can bootstrap development. :) Definitely a good idea. In my application I tried to break XEP 116 into bite-sized chunks*, but a well-defined subset (defined by someone who knows the spec) will be an excellent starting post. *: the first chunk being 4 message negotiation with a single block cipher and no public keys. PS. Hi list, I expect to be spending quite a bit of time here over the next few months.
pgpAPnazZ5caG.pgp
Description: PGP signature
