Jonathan Dickinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ESessions is pretty swanky, I must admit. I must have missed the > email about it somehow. Has it been reviewed at all? What protocol is > it based on?
It's more or less OTR done properly. And XMPPish. > But the protocol itself is still probably useful if it is made > more formal. OTR was the inspiration for ESessions, I guess. At least, they are very similar. > All that I am saying is that instead of coming up with our own > protocols etc. we should be concentrating on how existing ones could > be made to fit into the current XMPP standards. ESessions already exists, so it's an existing one :P. PS: Producing TOFU (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TOFU) on a mailing list isn't so nice :/ -- Jonathan
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
