Jonathan Dickinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You are pretty much describing IBB. Having an actual message is a > moot point. The users would have set up ESessions or IBB which means > they both support it. If they don't both support it, the whole > process will break long before they get to use IBB or ESessions.
This pretty much shows you never used such a technology in real world. We actually *HAD* the case that messages got to the wrong resource due to one resource going offline etc. and otherwise you would never notice something got lost! > Having it in a message stanza makes no sense. As I stated above, it absolutely does. -- Jonathan
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
