On Sun, 24 Aug 2008 11:02:17 +0200 Dirk Meyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> David Banes wrote: > > On 24/08/2008, at 6:28 PM, Dirk Meyer wrote: > > > >>> 2) Most companies will want a c2s solution as they will need to > >>> scan, archive and audit content in the same way they for email now > >> > >> They do? It could be a nice optional feature but if they force me > >> using c2s I go to a different provider. > > > > I'm talking about corporate implementations, where a company puts > > tight controls on it's users communications or has a regulatory > > requirement to do things like archiving. > > Ok, in that case all discussion here about SAS or TLS comes to the > same conclusion: companies will block it no matter what we design. > > > Dirk > *Some companies*, not *companies*. But otherwise it's perfectly correct ;). Pavel -- Web: http://www.pavlix.net/ Jabber & Mail: pavlix(at)pavlix.net OpenID: pavlix.net
