On Aug 25, 2008, at 11:24 AM, Jonathan Schleifer wrote:
Am 25.08.2008 um 12:17 schrieb Pedro Melo:
My point was not about the namespace (I just copied and pasted from
the previous example) but making sure that we don't start placing
per-user information on disco#info replies, something that will
break Caps caching.
I thought like this: We list all our client supports there. That
won't break caps caching. But we should NOT only list the one we
prefer there or something like that! We should list all we support.
I think you should list all that have a chance of completing
successfully. If my client support GPG but I didn't gave it my key, he
should not announce it.
And yes, as along as no personal, per-user information is sent on the
disco#info replies, caps caching should be ok.
Best regards,
--
Pedro Melo
Blog: http://www.simplicidade.org/notes/
XMPP ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Use XMPP!
