Bugs item #2990003, was opened at 2010-04-20 17:36
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by nobody
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=713730&aid=2990003&group_id=129076
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
Category: Query Execution
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Private: No
Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: bad value at "for $x at $pos in $y order by $z"
Initial Comment:
I've just hit this bug. When I use an order by in conjunction with "at
$pos", the position returned is not in the returned set, but in the
source set.
for $x at $pos in (5,2,1,6,7) order by $x return
<TR><TD>{$pos}</TD><TD>{$x}</TD></TR> &
I was expecting the value for $pos to be incremental from 1 to 5, but it
instead returned the position in the initial set.
I think this is a bug. If not, how do I get the actual position after
the sort?
daniel
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=713730&aid=2990003&group_id=129076
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
_______________________________________________
Sedna-discussion mailing list
Sedna-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sedna-discussion
