Hello, I'm integrating Sedna with Apache Cocoon 3 and would like to ask which Java API to prefer - Sedna own or XQJ? In my case API-dependent code has very limited amount and is easy to replace, so non-common API is not a problem. Also as Sedna doesn't support nested updates, variable binding is not very useful. What I dislike about Foster's XQJ impl is missing source - impossible to debug and understand when doc is not enough. So what would be a better choice? Which performs better / less memory? Why Sedna own API disappeared from downloads page?
Regards, Andrei Lunjov ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Beautiful is writing same markup. Internet Explorer 9 supports standards for HTML5, CSS3, SVG 1.1, ECMAScript5, and DOM L2 & L3. Spend less time writing and rewriting code and more time creating great experiences on the web. Be a part of the beta today. http://p.sf.net/sfu/beautyoftheweb _______________________________________________ Sedna-discussion mailing list Sedna-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sedna-discussion
