Thanks Ivan (and Charles) - modules are exact what I needed.

Sent from my iPhone

On Feb 6, 2012, at 1:26 AM, Ivan Shcheklein <shchekl...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Matisse,
> 
> If I wish to use a user defined function in an XQuery (for example, any of 
> the functions from http://www.xqueryfunctions.com/) the only option I see is 
> to include the function definition in the query I pass to sedna.
> 
> Why, you can use modules - 
> http://sedna.org/progguide/ProgGuidesu8.html#x14-570002.5.5
> 
>  
> This seems inefficient.
> What is the performance impact of adding function definitions to every query?
> 
> Depends on query itself. Usually, it's pretty small.
>  
> Is there a better way?
> Perhaps a way to have a local library of functions that are always available 
> for a particular database?
> 
> Try modules in Sedna.
>  
> Ivan Shcheklein,
> Sedna Team
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Try before you buy = See our experts in action!
The most comprehensive online learning library for Microsoft developers
is just $99.99! Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL - plus HTML5, CSS3, MVC3,
Metro Style Apps, more. Free future releases when you subscribe now!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/learndevnow-dev2
_______________________________________________
Sedna-discussion mailing list
Sedna-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sedna-discussion

Reply via email to