Folks,

I've had a considerable response to my original message,
which I posted to the grvmag, SEGmin and geophysics lists,
plus some personally addressed messages. Very broadly, the
lists cover petroleum exploration, mineral exploration and
environmental and geotechnical work respectively, with
significant overlap.

Some of the replies went back on the lists and you've seen
those. Quite a lot more came to me directly and I even had a
couple of phone calls. Many thanks to all responders. To
summarise, for the benefit of the cross-subject information:

1. Petroleum exploration. PII unnecessary and never required
by clients. They recognise the non-unique nature of the
problem. Limited company protection was thought helpful,
though. "Best endeavours" clauses are in wide use in
contracts.

2. Mineral exploration. Ditto. Additional comments were that
insurance was only going to attract lawsuits, and once
again, limited company protection is worthwhile.

3. Environmental and geotechnical. This is traditionally
litigious territory and it shows....
Seems to be required quite widely and thought necessary by
many. Sometimes possible to get the client to include you on
their policy for small jobs. Sometimes possible to shelter
within a larger environmental group for a particular job.
Sometimes tell the client the price will be higher if he
wants PII and they drop the requirement. Occasionally big
jobs have unlimited liability X-Mozilla-Status: 0009nly be
considered by major firms. We all hope that trend goes
away....
Shopping around is very worthwhile. Factors of 10 or more in
premiums seem to exist. Appropriate coverage seems to be USD
2 million or GBP 1  million.

Now you all know.

Best regards and thanks again. This would be a good time to
terminate this thread, I think......
--
Alan B Reid PhD
Reid Geophysics
49 Carr Bridge Drive
Leeds LS16 7LB
UK

Phone:  +(44)-113-261-0252
Fax:    +(44)-113-293-0062
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
website: www.reidgeophys.freeserve.co.uk
_______________________________________________________
List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]

Reply via email to