Alan, Roger,

Geological Survey of Finland used the transverse gradient system for the 
country-wide AM mapping program, from mid 1970s to early 2000s (over two 
million line kms total). I recall Sheldon Breiner visited us in late 1970s to 
see the system in operation. Yes there was a Geometrics TN, but our work was 
originally inspired by the aircraft (DC-3 first, then DHC Twin Otter) 
characteristics. Sheldon made a comment that it was nice to see that it works 
before the company/group trying it goes bust - he had tried to advocate the 
system without any success.

The brains behind the system design and implementation were late Maunu Puranen 
(inventor of the Dual-Frequency AEM system) and Juha Korhonen, whose review 
paper on the subject is freely accessible at

http://tupa.gtk.fi/julkaisu/specialpaper/sp_039_pages_077_102.pdf 
<http://tupa.gtk.fi/julkaisu/specialpaper/sp_039_pages_077_102.pdf>

Best (personal) regards and greetings,
Markku Peltoniemi



> [email protected] kirjoitti 20.2.2019 kello 16.02:
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Today's Topics:
> 
>   1. Re: Cross-line magnetic field measurements - an enquiry (and
>      a challenge?) (Roger Henderson)
>   2. Re: Cross-line magnetic field measurements - an enquiry (and
>      a challenge?) (Alan Reid)
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Message: 1
> Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2019 12:10:04 +1100
> From: Roger Henderson <[email protected]>
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [SEGMIN] Cross-line magnetic field measurements - an
>       enquiry (and a challenge?)
> Message-ID: <[email protected]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
> 
> Alan,
> I was intrigued to see Rich?s name again after I have just included it in a 
> review I am doing on data processing in Australia.
> As I ran Geometrics in Australia I know we certainly used the reduction in 
> spacing that appeared to be the case, as a selling point for horizontal 
> gradient flying but I don?t know about the proof that it was exactly halved. 
> It did seem to be true in reality.
> Because I just had correspondence with Ian Lilly who worked for Geometrics 
> and liased with Rich and was much closer to the processing than I was, below 
> is Ian?s reply to my asking if he knew the whereabouts of the proof. (The 
> 'pencil and paper' seems right for Rich)
> 
> I remember Rich doing the proof in pencil on a yellow pad during one of my 
> visits to Sunnyvale. I have a very vague and possibly faulty recollection 
> that geoMetrics published a simplified version in something like a tech note 
> when they were trying to garner interest in gradiometers.
> 
> I am not aware of the ?tech note? (anymore, at least!).
> Maybe someone in Geometrics or Dick Wold, who was involved at the time, knows 
> more.
> 
> I hope you can track it down.
> Regards
> Roger Henderson
> 
>> On 19 Feb 2019, at 7:45 pm, Alan Reid via SEGMIN <[email protected]> 
>> wrote:
>> 
>> Dear GrvMag and SEGMin listers
>> 
>> I?m addressing both lists because the matter concerns both?
>> 
>> Years ago, the late great Richard Hansen told me he?d proved that, for a 
>> conventional airborne magnetic total field survey, cross-line gradient 
>> measurements gave you the equivalent of halving the line spacing. The proof 
>> was for noise-free data, but hey, it's an indication of a usefulness that?s 
>> widely recognised and exploited.
>> 
>> I subsequently asked Richard for his proof and he?d lost it, but he 
>> re-proved it another way. Regrettably, I?ve now also lost that proof. And 
>> Richard is no longer available to ask??  Hence the enquiry and the challenge.
>> 
>> 1. Does anyone know of a published proof?  If so, please may we have the 
>> reference (and even maybe a link to a pdf?
>> 
>> 2. If not, does anyone have a proof they?d be prepared to offer for 
>> publication. I?d happily welcome it to ?Geophysical Prospecting?, and I?m 
>> sure ?Geophysics? and some other journals would be equally welcoming.
>> 
>> 3. If neither of the above, the challenge is to produce a proof. It?d make a 
>> decent basis for an MSc,  a pretty chapter in a PhD, and/or a worthwhile 
>> paper. From a personal perspective, it?d also ?complete? the survey design 
>> criteria I published in 1980. 
>> 
>> Regards
>> 
>> Alan B Reid PhD
>> Reid Geophysics Ltd
>> 7 Keymer House
>> Michel Grove
>> Eastbourne BN21 1JZ
>> UK
>> 

-----------------------
SEGMIN community mailing list service ([email protected]).
Change your personal options here: 
https://lists.geosoft.com/mailman/options/segmin/archive%40mail-archive.com
Colleagues can join here: https://lists.geosoft.com/mailman/listinfo/segmin
Archives: https://lists.geosoft.com/mailman/private/segmin/
NOTE that <Reply> will reply to all members of the list.

Reply via email to