Just said because I have to renew my uav pilot license, not said to close
anyone's view I have to study and can't respond after today!

Cheers

On Tue, Nov 17, 2020, 5:59 AM Ed Cunion <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Clark,
>
> I'm not sure what your post is about?
>
> This is what I was getting at with non technical posts in Segmin being
> misunderstood and like entering a rabbit hole.
>
> My comment in another post on our big box stores was more about how many
> geoscientists are too individualistic as scientists to be boxed in to a
> generic mass employment situation. Many value their individuality and free
> thinking ways over groupthink or generification.
>
> Many but not all would rather be individual go-it your-own-way prospecter
> or contractor types and not want to be boxed in to a generic employment
> situation.
>
> As far as surveying equipment goes it has to be tested out in real world
> situations where data is produced and results can be presented.
>
> We all have histories, part of mine includes being involved in field
> studies where some gravity surveying equipment was tested, where a couple
> airborne gravity gradiometer systems were field tested and compared with
> each other and with ground gravity survey data.
>
> Another one was during the same field campaign that lasted at least 5
> years, was where an airborne TEM system was compared with a couple ground
> TEM systems. I was able to author a paper on that one that's published.
>
> I've recently tested two very high resolution magnetometers and presented
> results on them.
>
> None of any of that equipment, the gravimeters, the EM equipment, or the
> magnetometers are big box store generic stuff. All are examples of
> sophisticated surveying equipment. The data results after field testing
> showed this. The gravity paper can also be looked up.
>
> The big box store comment was more on the lines many geoscientists want to
> be individual scientists and not cookie cutter scientists, free to go out
> and explore, do prospecting, or do surveying in general, that was the gist.
>
> Sensors in general of all types are getting smaller higher resolution less
> power hungry and more affordable, just a fact of scientific progress.
>
> Please feel free to add your two cents if you'd like. This is my last post
> this week I have work to do here,
>
> Cheers,
>
> Ed
>
> Ed Cunion
> Red Rocks Geophysical
> Lakewood, CO 80228
> Mobile/text 720 300 3641
>
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 16, 2020, 12:22 PM Clark Jorgensen via SEGMIN <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Ken,
>>
>> I have to disagree strongly with you, at least in regard with ground
>> contractors.  The ETD only includes new innovations.  Many of the
>> "innovations" in ground survey techniques are only marketing techniques
>> that have little if any chance of improving data quality and in many cases
>> produce worthless data.  The ETD has the veneer of being endorsed by
>> geophysicists, so it is not surprising that many geologists think it is a
>> statement of proven survey techniques.
>>
>> Clark Jorgensen
>>
>>
>> On 11/16/20 8:15 AM, Ken Witherly via SEGMIN wrote:
>>
>> Dear Colleagues
>>
>>
>>
>> The 2021 edition of the Exploration Trends and Developments is in the
>> final stages of the ‘request for input’ period, with a hard deadline of Nov
>> 22 (next Monday).
>>
>>
>>
>> After a series of discussions with Dr. Pat Killeen, the Northern Miner
>> Press and DMEC, we have agreed that the ETD is a very important bench mark
>> piece for the geophysical community and that keeping the publication as a 
>> *physical
>> publication is important*.
>>
>>
>>
>> If you provide a product or service which is related to geophysical
>> applications for minerals exploration or environmental studies, please
>> consider submitting at an update to Killeen for possible inclusion into the
>> next edition of the ETD.
>>
>>
>>
>> The attached request for input states Nov 9 is the close off date but
>> this has been extended to Nov 22.
>>
>>
>>
>> A copy of the current edition (March 2020) can be accessed at:
>>
>>
>>
>> https://www.condorconsult.com/downloads/ETD-2020-Final.pdf
>>
>>
>>
>> Regards/Ken
>>
>>
>>
>> *The Greatest Obstacle to Discovery Is Not*
>>
>> *Ignorance—It Is the Illusion of Knowledge*
>>
>>
>>
>> Condor Consulting, Inc
>>
>> St. 150-2201 Kipling St.
>>
>> Lakewood CO 80215 USA
>>
>> T: 303-423-8475
>>
>>
>>
>> Condor North Consulting ULC
>>
>> 170 - 422 Richards St.
>>
>> Vancouver BC Canada V6B 2Z4
>>
>> T: 604-630-8334
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -----------------------
>> SEGMIN community mailing list service ([email protected]).
>> Change your personal options here: 
>> https://lists.geosoft.com/mailman/options/segmin/clark%40bigskygeo.com
>> Colleagues can join here: https://lists.geosoft.com/mailman/listinfo/segmin
>> Archives: https://lists.geosoft.com/mailman/private/segmin/
>> NOTE that <Reply> will reply to all members of the list.
>>
>>
>> --
>> Clark Jorgensen
>> Big Sky Geophysics
>> P.O. Box 353
>> Bozeman, MT 59771  USA
>> +1 (406) 587-6330 office
>> +1 (406) 580-9718 mobile
>>
>> -----------------------
>> SEGMIN community mailing list service ([email protected]).
>> Change your personal options here:
>> https://lists.geosoft.com/mailman/options/segmin/ed.cunion%40gmail.com
>> Colleagues can join here:
>> https://lists.geosoft.com/mailman/listinfo/segmin
>> Archives: https://lists.geosoft.com/mailman/private/segmin/
>> NOTE that <Reply> will reply to all members of the list.
>>
>
-----------------------
SEGMIN community mailing list service ([email protected]).
Change your personal options here: 
https://lists.geosoft.com/mailman/options/segmin/archive%40mail-archive.com
Colleagues can join here: https://lists.geosoft.com/mailman/listinfo/segmin
Archives: https://lists.geosoft.com/mailman/private/segmin/
NOTE that <Reply> will reply to all members of the list.

Reply via email to