On Sun, 2 Apr 2017 11:46:59 PM Ben Hutchings wrote: > > Dear kernel maintainer, do you have an idea about this? > > It's been that way in Debian since at least 2005. So anyone who has a > working SELinux policy for Debian must have taken this behaviour into > account. > > Maybe we'll go with the new default for buster.
Thanks for the quick response. Changing it for buster seems like a reasonable plan if upstream doesn't change anything in the mean time. -- My Main Blog http://etbe.coker.com.au/ My Documents Blog http://doc.coker.com.au/ _______________________________________________ SELinux-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/selinux-devel
