Signed-off-by: Nicolas Iooss <[email protected]>
---
libsepol/src/module_to_cil.c | 10 +++++-----
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/libsepol/src/module_to_cil.c b/libsepol/src/module_to_cil.c
index 45acdeb1a4e0..ac095c30f4f3 100644
--- a/libsepol/src/module_to_cil.c
+++ b/libsepol/src/module_to_cil.c
@@ -791,8 +791,8 @@ static int cil_print_attr_strs(int indent, struct policydb
*pdb, int is_type, vo
// CIL doesn't support anonymous positive/negative/complemented sets.
So
// instead we create a CIL type/roleattributeset that matches the set.
If
// the set has a negative set, then convert it to is (P & !N), where P
is
- // the list of members in the positive set , and N is the list of
members
- // in the negative set. Additonally, if the set is complemented, then
wrap
+ // the list of members in the positive set and N is the list of members
+ // in the negative set. Additionally, if the set is complemented, then
wrap
// the whole thing with a negation.
struct ebitmap_node *node;
@@ -2103,13 +2103,13 @@ static int role_to_cil(int indent, struct policydb
*pdb, struct avrule_block *UN
// the policy type, it would result in duplicate
declarations,
// which isn't allowed in CIL. Patches have been made
to refpolicy
// to remove these duplicate role declarations, but we
need to be
- // backwards compatable and support older policies.
Since we know
+ // backwards compatible and support older policies.
Since we know
// these roles are always declared in base, only print
them when we
// see them in the base module. If the declarations
appear in a
// non-base module, ignore their declarations.
//
// Note that this is a hack, and if a policy author
does not define
- // one of these roles in base, the declaration will not
appeaer in
+ // one of these roles in base, the declaration will not
appear in
// the resulting policy, likely resulting in a
compilation error in
// CIL.
//
@@ -2289,7 +2289,7 @@ static int user_to_cil(int indent, struct policydb *pdb,
struct avrule_block *bl
if (block->flags & AVRULE_OPTIONAL) {
// sensitivites in user statements in optionals do not have the
- // standard -1 offest
+ // standard -1 offset
sens_offset = 0;
}
--
2.12.0
_______________________________________________
Selinux mailing list
[email protected]
To unsubscribe, send email to [email protected].
To get help, send an email containing "help" to [email protected].
