On Tue, 2018-02-13 at 12:55 -0500, Paul Moore wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 11:22 AM, Richard Haines
> <richard_c_hai...@btinternet.com> wrote:
> > On Mon, 2018-02-12 at 16:13 -0500, Paul Moore wrote:
> > > A quick note to let you know that I've just rebased the
> > > selinux/next
> > > branch to v4.16-rc1. Over the next day or two I'm going to be
> > > working
> > > through the backlog of kernel patches, most notably the SCTP
> > > work.
> > >
> > I've just rebuilt the SCTP patch set on Fedora using:
> > kernel-4.16.0-0.rc1.git0.1.fc28.src.rpm
> > I found there were a number of changes required to get the SCTP
> > specific patches (2/4 and 3/4) to build as there have been many
> > updates
> > since kernel 4.14.
> > The 4-16 kernel build passes my SCTP SELinux Testsuite although I
> > also
> > added the "netlabel: If PF_INET6, check sk_buff ip header version"
> > 
> > patch as well.
> > It's probably best I post these patches so the SCTP team can
> > finally ok
> > them (or not).
> If you don't mind doing the rebase that would be helpful. We'll have
> to wait and see what the changes look like, but I don't expect there
> to be a problem with the SCTP folks, Marcelo has been very helpful
> thus far.
> As far as the NetLabel patch is concerned, yes, go ahead and include
> that in the patchset.
I did not include the "netlabel: If PF_INET6, check sk_buff ip header
version"  in the final V6 patches as it was the only one that did
not require a rebase, therefore  can still go standalone in kernel
> >  https://marc.info/?l=selinux&m=151061619115945&w=2