On Fri, 2018-02-23 at 08:21 +0800, kbuild test robot wrote:
> tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/pcmoore/selin
> ux.git next
> head: db97c9f9d31217e3e133056fe2bea76639f87ec1
> commit: db97c9f9d31217e3e133056fe2bea76639f87ec1 [5/5] selinux: Add
> SCTP support
> config: x86_64-allyesdebian (attached as .config)
> compiler: gcc-7 (Debian 7.3.0-1) 7.3.0
> reproduce:
> git checkout db97c9f9d31217e3e133056fe2bea76639f87ec1
> # save the attached .config to linux build tree
> make ARCH=x86_64
>
> All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
>
> In file included from security/selinux/hooks.c:99:0:
> > > security/selinux/include/netlabel.h:135:66: error: unknown type
> > > name 'sock'
>
> static inline void selinux_netlbl_sctp_sk_clone(struct sock *sk,
> sock *newsk)
>
> ^~~~
> security/selinux/hooks.c: In function 'selinux_sctp_sk_clone':
> > > security/selinux/hooks.c:5182:2: error: implicit declaration of
> > > function 'selinux_netlbl_sctp_sk_clone'; did you mean
> > > 'selinux_netlbl_inet_csk_clone'? [-Werror=implicit-function-
> > > declaration]
>
> selinux_netlbl_sctp_sk_clone(sk, newsk);
> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> selinux_netlbl_inet_csk_clone
> cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
> --
> In file included from security/selinux/ss/services.c:68:0:
> > > security/selinux/include/netlabel.h:135:66: error: unknown type
> > > name 'sock'
>
> static inline void selinux_netlbl_sctp_sk_clone(struct sock *sk,
> sock *newsk)
>
> ^~~~
> --
> In file included from security//selinux/hooks.c:99:0:
> > > security/selinux/include/netlabel.h:135:66: error: unknown type
> > > name 'sock'
>
> static inline void selinux_netlbl_sctp_sk_clone(struct sock *sk,
> sock *newsk)
>
> ^~~~
> security//selinux/hooks.c: In function 'selinux_sctp_sk_clone':
> security//selinux/hooks.c:5182:2: error: implicit declaration of
> function 'selinux_netlbl_sctp_sk_clone'; did you mean
> 'selinux_netlbl_inet_csk_clone'? [-Werror=implicit-function-
> declaration]
> selinux_netlbl_sctp_sk_clone(sk, newsk);
> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> selinux_netlbl_inet_csk_clone
> cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
>
> vim +/sock +135 security/selinux/include/netlabel.h
>
> 120
> 121 static inline int
> selinux_netlbl_sctp_assoc_request(struct sctp_endpoint *ep,
> 122 str
> uct sk_buff *skb)
> 123 {
> 124 return 0;
> 125 }
> 126 static inline int
> selinux_netlbl_inet_conn_request(struct request_sock *req,
> 127 u16
> family)
> 128 {
> 129 return 0;
> 130 }
> 131 static inline void selinux_netlbl_inet_csk_clone(struct
> sock *sk, u16 family)
> 132 {
> 133 return;
> 134 }
> > 135 static inline void selinux_netlbl_sctp_sk_clone(struct
> sock *sk, sock *newsk)
Paul,
Would you like a new selinux-Add-SCTP-support.patch to fix this.
> 136 {
> 137 return;
> 138 }
> 139 static inline int
> selinux_netlbl_socket_post_create(struct sock *sk,
> 140 u16
> family)
> 141 {
> 142 return 0;
> 143 }
> 144 static inline int selinux_netlbl_sock_rcv_skb(struct
> sk_security_struct *sksec,
> 145 struct
> sk_buff *skb,
> 146 u16
> family,
> 147 struct
> common_audit_data *ad)
> 148 {
> 149 return 0;
> 150 }
> 151 static inline int
> selinux_netlbl_socket_setsockopt(struct socket *sock,
> 152 int
> level,
> 153 int
> optname)
> 154 {
> 155 return 0;
> 156 }
> 157 static inline int selinux_netlbl_socket_connect(struct
> sock *sk,
> 158 struct
> sockaddr *addr)
> 159 {
> 160 return 0;
> 161 }
> 162 static inline int
> selinux_netlbl_socket_connect_locked(struct sock *sk,
> 163
> struct sockaddr *addr)
> 164 {
> 165 return 0;
> 166 }
> 167 #endif /* CONFIG_NETLABEL */
> 168
>
> ---
> 0-DAY kernel test infrastructure Open Source
> Technology Center
> https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all Intel
> Corporation
