Sorry, I don't understand - are you talking about handling empty fields on a field-by-field basis, or having special handling if the user doesn't fill out anything? And what's a stub template transclusion?
Also, if an empty value would require special handling, you could always make the field mandatory. -Yaron On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 5:10 PM, John McClure <[email protected]>wrote: > > If no information has been provided for fields that are for-template, > then it seems reasonable that the form author should be able to choose > whether SF generates a stub template transclusion or not. It can be > difficult for a template to determine whether conditions exist to > apply a category or not, so I think it may be better to have that > decision made in the form itself. > > In a similar vein, it would be handy to specify that the default value > for a field is to be ignored in the event that no other fields for a > template have been provided. In other words, it may be useful to > discuss a few use cases involving the default attribute. > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Semantic Forms" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/semantic-forms?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
