The change of property type ? I am sure of it.

I will keep an eye open and let you know if it happens again. I will have
other classes to create once the patch it available for the other issue I
reported.

- Laurent

On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 1:55 PM, Yaron Koren <yaro...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Are you sure about that? I can't duplicate that error.
>
> On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 1:35 PM, Laurent Alquier <lalqu...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> One other observation while you are looking into these parts of the code.
>>
>> When I created that class, I assigned a property 'Has description' to the
>> new class.
>>
>> The property already existed, with type text.
>>
>> Once the class was created, that property suddenly switched to 'Page'.
>>
>> It looks like the Create Class form created the property even though it
>> already existed - and created it with a type 'Page' even though I selected
>> 'Text' in the drop down list.
>>
>> - Laurent
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 1:22 PM, Laurent Alquier <lalqu...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>> Good to hear - I have another bug report on the way regarding External
>>> Data (I will send that one to you directly).
>>>
>>> After using SMW and Forms for a year, I am slowly settling on a personal
>>> convention:
>>>
>>> - Use plain english for the label of the forms and templates
>>> - Use the property name for the actual field name
>>>
>>> That way, the template uses the property names - which makes it easier to
>>> automate things afterward (I found myself wanting to analyze properties at
>>> the page level, without going to 'Browse date' or 'RDF'... and having
>>> different values between properties and field names makes that task more
>>> difficult).
>>>
>>> - Laurent
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 11:33 AM, Yaron Koren <yaro...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Laurent - thanks for the bug reports. The second one is rather
>>>> remarkable - it looks like I never actually wrote the code to use the field
>>>> name at all, but assumed I had... these should both be fixed in the next
>>>> version.
>>>>
>>>> Dan - there are valid reasons to have a property name different from the
>>>> template field name. For instance, I'm one of the people (though in the
>>>> minority) who think that the property name should be a predicate, e.g. "Has
>>>> author".
>>>>
>>>> -Yaron
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 3:36 AM, Dan Bolser <dan.bol...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> 2009/5/29 Laurent Alquier <lalqu...@gmail.com>:
>>>>> > Hi
>>>>> > I used the Create Class form for the first time today and while it
>>>>> did
>>>>> > create the classes I wanted, it also threw a couple of errors in the
>>>>> > process.
>>>>> > 1- I got the following PHP error for each field processed by the
>>>>> form:
>>>>> > Notice: Undefined property: SFTemplateField::$input_type in <PATH TO
>>>>> > EXTENSIONS>\extensions\SemanticForms\includes\SF_FormField.inc on
>>>>> line 222
>>>>> >
>>>>> > 2- The form ignored by choice for Field name (it used the property
>>>>> name by
>>>>> > default).
>>>>>
>>>>> Is there any reason the 'class' shouldn't enforce that convention?
>>>>> i.e. just have two choices, property name and display name, and use
>>>>> the property name as the field name.
>>>>>
>>>>> Seems like a logical convention to have, but it may cause problems for
>>>>> reasons I haven't considered.
>>>>>
>>>>> > Other than that, it's a great time saver.
>>>>> > - Laurent Alquier
>>>>> > >
>>>>> >
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> - Laurent Alquier
>>> http://www.linfa.net
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> - Laurent Alquier
>> http://www.linfa.net
>>
>>
>>
>
> >
>


-- 
- Laurent Alquier
http://www.linfa.net

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Semantic Forms" group.
To post to this group, send email to semantic-forms@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
semantic-forms+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/semantic-forms?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to