Is an "internal object" similar to an RDF blank node?

Yaron Koren wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> The long recent discussion(s) on the SMW users list about n-ary 
> relations, many-typed properties and the like got me thinking about what 
> it would actually take to add support to SMW for what I call n-ary 
> relations and some people call internal properties: properties that can 
> be associated together in a free-form way. Having thought about it some 
> more, I now believe it can be done fairly straightforwardly.
> 
> I'm going on the assumption that double-brackets and the like are on the 
> way out, to be replaced by parser functions, and so I'm imagining a 
> parser function called, say, #internal_set, that would be called in the 
> following way:
> 
> {{#internal_set:main_property|prop1=val1|prop2=val2|...}}
> 
> An example would be:
> 
> {{#internal_set:Is leader of|Has name=Charles de Gaulle|Has start date=1 
> June 1958|Has end date=8 January 1959}}
> 
> This parser function would create an "internal object" for the page from 
> which it was called. The first property would link between the main page 
> and that internal object, but - and this is important to note - it would 
> link *from* the internal object, *to* the main page; which seems less 
> logical than the other way around, but makes querying easier (and fits 
> in with my general philosophy that children should link to parents). The 
> other arguments would be all the other properties of the internal 
> object, and their values.
> 
> I believe that what's really needed to get all this working is a new SMW 
> type for "internal objects", which might be called "SMWInternalValue". 
> Like SMWWikiPageValue, it would allow properties pointing out from it, 
> but unlike SMWWikiPageValue, it wouldn't represent an actual URI in the 
> wiki; its printed value would just be a string that might look like 
> "France#1" or "France#2". And its name would never show up in queries - 
> a query like:
> 
> {{#ask:[[Is leader of.Has continent::Europe]]|? Has name|? Has start 
> date|? Has end date}}
> 
> ...would show the "leader" information for all countries in Europe, but 
> it wouldn't show the "main" column - just the three for the actual values.
> 
> (Or maybe the internal-object column should show up as well, by default 
> - I don't know.)
> 
> The "SMWInternalValue" would also be unique in that no properties would 
> point to it - it would only have its own properties, linking it to the 
> page it's on as well as to its other values.
> 
> So the work needed would be to create this parser function, and the 
> corresponding new type, and make sure that all the usual functionality - 
> adding, deleting, querying - worked with it.
> 
> In any case, that's my idea. Any thoughts?
> 
> -Yaron
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by:
> SourcForge Community
> SourceForge wants to tell your story.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Semediawiki-devel mailing list
> Semediawiki-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/semediawiki-devel


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
SourcForge Community
SourceForge wants to tell your story.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword
_______________________________________________
Semediawiki-devel mailing list
Semediawiki-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/semediawiki-devel

Reply via email to